🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a growing group of countries are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation may be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media users. Officials have indicated that an similar ban remains "one of the tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a proposal raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a comparable action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is provided. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a good first step," stated a leading MEP behind the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "based on robust research".

Previously, interest built behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who died after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for children," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, regulation is largely unfolding at the local government level amid federal inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced laws demanding guardian approval for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some figures to copy this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Outside of these regions, other nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, international agencies strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The body highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of Australia and others indicate that policymakers around the world are less and less willing to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.